Nonduality is not a definition. This is why it’s called nonduality; we’re saying what it’s not, not what it is. It’s not dual, it’s not two, and you could spend your whole life going through everything that it’s not, but you could never ever say what it actually is because it’s the absence of all these things that it’s not. So, it’s not a definition, and that’s why it’s just crazy to read all the really ancient nondual teachers because, first of all, their language is so weird for us that we tend to turn it into a definition. So, every time we quote some dude about nonduality, you just said what it’s not. Whatever that is, it’s not.